International Journal of Intelligent Computing Systems

Peer Review Process

The International Journal of Intelligent Computing Systems follows a structured and impartial peer review process to uphold academic integrity and ensure the quality of published research. Each manuscript is subjected to an initial editorial assessment followed by expert evaluation.

During the preliminary screening, the editorial team checks for plagiarism using tool Turnitin , validates references, and determines the manuscript’s suitability in relation to the journal's aims and scope. Submissions that fail to meet basic criteria are declined at this stage.

Manuscripts considered appropriate are forwarded for peer review by at least two independent subject experts. The journal employs a Double-Blind Review model, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process.

Reviewers are requested to provide their detailed feedback and recommendations within three weeks. Based on their assessments, the editorial team may choose to accept the paper, request minor or major revisions, or reject the manuscript. The final decision rests with the editorial board.

The peer review workflow is outlined below:

• Manuscript is submitted to the International Journal of Intelligent Computing Systems.
• Editorial team conducts initial review for scope, formatting, and plagiarism check.
• Suitable manuscripts are forwarded to two independent reviewers.
• Double-Blind Peer Review is conducted to ensure impartial evaluation.
• Authors may be asked to revise the manuscript based on reviewer comments.
• Final decision is made by the editorial board upon satisfactory revision.
• Proofreading and final formatting are completed before publication.